INCLUSIVE DESIGN: THE BASIS OF THE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF A PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2021/2025-4-8Keywords:
professional competence, inclusive design, teacher training, primary school, design of learning experiencesAbstract
In the modern educational space focused on inclusion, the key factor for success is the professional competence of the primary school teacher, which should be based on the principles of inclusive design (ID). The essence of this approach is the initial design of the educational process, where all its components, from educational resources to methods, are created as universally accessible and adaptive, taking into account the diversity of needs of all students. The use of ID allows the teacher to abandon the constant correction of educational material and instead proactively create an educational experience that is accessible to all students. The purpose of the study is to theoretically substantiate and develop requirements for the content of training future primary school teachers, focused on the principles of design for all. Achieving this goal requires an analysis of world experience and identification of key inclusive competencies of teachers, as well as substantiation of theoretical and methodological foundations for the formation of readiness of future specialists to work in such an environment. The need to implement the principles of IE in the curricula and disciplines of higher education institutions is emphasized. The most effective training strategies are systematized, which include: project-based learning (focused on creating universal materials), simulation models (working with virtual environments) and case studies (solving real inclusive challenges). It is substantiated that teachers must master modern technologies, since they are key tools of inclusive design that expand the possibilities of access to information. It is established that a key component of successful training is the formation of teachers’ ability to reflect on their own practice and constantly adjust the educational environment in accordance with the dynamic needs of students. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the development of a classification of international models of training future teachers to integrate inclusive design, as well as in the formulation of a set of criteria for assessing their readiness to create a functionally and aesthetically perfect inclusive educational space. The practical significance of the work lies in providing specific recommendations for updating educational programs, which will ensure a qualitative transition from formal inclusion to true optimization of the educational process, increasing academic performance, social adaptation and psychological comfort of all students without exception.
References
Альніков Є.М. Проєктування інклюзивного середовища з використанням адитивних технологій (3-d друк). Вісник КНУКіМ. Серія: Мистецтвознавство. 2020. 43. С. 181–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1176.43.2020.220251.
Волкова К. Сутність та критерії готовності майбутніх учителів початкових класів до оцінювальної діяльності в умовах інклюзивної освіти. Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології. 2017. № 3(67). С. 155–165.
Галюка О.С., Собчук А.А. Соціальна мобільність учителя початкової школи в умовах інклюзивної освіти. Академічні студії. Серія «Педагогіка». 2022. Вип. 1. № 4. С. 64–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52726/as.pedagogy/2021.4.1.9.
Демченко І.І. Теоретичні і методичні засади підготовки майбутнього учителя початкових класів до професійної діяльності в умовах інклюзивної освіти : автореф. дис. … на здобуття наукового ступеня доктора педагогічних наук ; Міністерство освіти і науки України, Уманський державний педагогічний університет імені Павла Тичини. Умань, 2016. 44 с.
Коргун Л.М., Хіля А.В. Алгоритми готовності майбутнього педагога до організації корекційно-розвивальної роботи як складової інклюзивного навчання. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems. 2021. 2(64). С. 97–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2022-64-97-107.
Chen H., Evans D., Luu B. Moving towards inclusive education: Secondary school teacher attitudes towards universal design for learning in Australia. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education. 2023. 47. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2023.1.
Kille-Speckter L., Nickpour F. The Evolution of Inclusive Design; A First Timeline Review of Narratives and Milestones of Design for Disability. Digital Library. 2022. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.690.
Lamirande M. Exploring Practices and Understandings of Designing Inclusively. PhD thesis The Open University. 2023. 228 с. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.000162cc.
Orozco I., Moriña A. How to become an inclusive teacher? Advice from Spanish educators involved in early childhood, primary, secondary and higher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2023. 38(5). 1–16. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2145688.
Patrick Vanessa M., Hollenbeck Candice R. Designing for All: Consumer Response to Inclusive Design. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2021. 31. 2. 360–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1225.
Pérez Valles C., Reeves Huapaya E. Educación inclusiva digital: Una revisión bibliográfica actualizada. Las brechas digitales en la educación inclusiva. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 23(3), 2023. 3–28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/aie.v23i3.54680.
Prokopenko O., Osadchenko I., Braslavska O., Malyshevska I., Рichkur M., Tyshchenko V. Competence approach in future specialist skills development. International Journal of Management (IJM). 2020. 11(4), 55–66. URL: https://dspace.udpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/12476
Saloviita T. Attitudes of teachers towards inclusive education in Finland. Psychological Reports. 2020. 123(1), 183–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1541819.
Sharma U., Loreman T., Forlin C. Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Jorsen. 2012. 12, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x.
Smith T. J. The Ergonomics of Learning: Educational Design and Learning Performance. Ergonomics. 2007. 50. 1530–1546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701587608.
Sobchuk A. A., Mykytenko N. O. Model of Primary School Teachers Training for Work in the System of Inclusive Education by Applying Extrapolation of Poland’s Advances in Training for Work. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2020. 19. 3. 352–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.19.
Tangi R. A. Inclusive Design Policy Implementation: An Organizational Knowledge Creation Perspective. January 2017. Reading. 183р.
Udych Z. U. Self-organization of a teacher of inclusive educational establishment in Ukraine as a system. Balkan Scientific Review. 2019. 3(2). 4. 64–68.
Wilson Nicky; Thomson Avril; Thomson Angus; Holliman Alexander. Understanding inclusive design education. International conference on engineering design, iced19. University of Strathclyde. 2019. 619–628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.66.
Woodcock S., Hardy I. Teacher self-efficacy, inclusion and professional development practices: cultivating a learning environment for all. Professional Development in Education. 2023. 51, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2267058.





