MODELS OF STEM EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT IN THE USA AND THEIR ADAPTATION FOR UKRAINE: THE EXPERIENCE OF CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2021/2026-1-3

Keywords:

STEM education, comparative analysis, California, Texas, educational policy, NGSS, TEKS, higher education, universities, Ukraine

Abstract

The article provides an in-depth comparative analysis of the development of STEM education in the United States using the example of the democratic state of California and the republican state of Texas in the period from 1930 to 2025. The influence of ideology and educational management approaches on educational policy, K-12 and higher education financing, the adoption of standards (NGSS/TEKS), the role of business and grant programs in supporting and developing STEM areas is studied. Quantitative performance indicators are used, including data from NAEP, TIMSS, state funding per student, and participation in STEM grants. A conceptual model is proposed that reflects the relationship between ideological orientations, educational policy, the content of STEM education, and the results of human capital training. It is substantiated that differences in approaches to the development of STEM education are determined not only by managerial approaches to education, but also by a set of socio-economic, institutional and historical factors, which limits the possibility of a direct correlation between the ideological orientation of the states and educational outcomes. Based on the analysis of the experience of California and Texas, practical recommendations for Ukraine are formulated, in particular, on the adaptation of integrative and applied models of STEM education in accordance with the provisions of the current educational legislation and the needs of the national economy, which meets the strategic goals of digitalization and European integration. The results obtained can be used in the process of modernization of the national system of STEM education in Ukraine, development of educational standards, training of pedagogical personnel for the high-tech sector of the economy and the formation of effective state educational policy.

References

Авшенюк Н., Дяченко Л., Огієнко О., Пазюра Н., Постригач Н. Забезпечення якості педагогічної освіти у зарубіжних країнах: монографія. Київ: ІПООД НАПН України, 2022. 373 с.

Батюк Л., Жерновникова О. Ґенезис математичної освіти в Сполучених Штатах Америки в другій половині XX століття – 20-х роках XXI століття. Теорія та методика навчання та виховання. 2025. № 59. С. 38–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34142/23128046.2025.59.03.

Закон України «Про вищу освіту». Відомості Верховної Ради (ВВР). 2014. № 37–38. Ст. 2004. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18#Text.

Закон України «Про освіту». Відомості Верховної Ради (ВВР). 2017. № 38–39. Ст. 380. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text.

Закон України «Про повну загальну середню освіту». Відомості Верховної Ради (ВВР). 2020. № 31. Ст. 226. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/463-20#Text.

Закон України «Про професійну (професійно-технічну) освіту». Відомості Верховної Ради України (ВВР). 1998. № 32. Ст. 215. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/103/98-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.

Про затвердження плану заходів щодо реалізації Концепції розвитку природничо- математичної освіти (STEM-освіти) до 2027 року. 2026. URL: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatverdzhennya-planu-zahodiv-sh-a131r.

Про схвалення Стратегії розвитку вищої освіти в Україні на 2022–2032 роки. 2022. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/286-2022-%D1%80#Text.

Тулученко Г. Державні програми підтримки досліджень в галузі математичних наук: досвід US NSF. Березневий науковий дискурс 2025 на тему: «Синергія освіти, науки та бізнесу в епоху глобальних трансформацій»: зб. матеріалів 3-ї Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. (м. Чернігів, 27 лютого 2025 року) / редкол.: Г. Старченко, А. Дука. Чернігів: ГО «Науково-освітній інноваційний центр суспільних трансформацій», 2025. С. 524–526.

Угода між Урядом України та Урядом Сполучених Штатів Америки про створення Американсько-українського інвестиційного фонду відбудови. 2026. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/840_001-25#Text.

Угода про позику (Програма «Підвищення доступності та стійкості освіти в умовах кризи в Україні») між Україною і Міжнародним банком реконструкції та розвитку. 2026. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996_011-24/sp:dark#Text.

A STEM Education Strategic Plan: skills for competitiveness and innovation. 13 p. 2025. URL: https://education.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025-03/STEM_Education_Strategic_Plan_COM_2025_89_1_EN_0.pdf.

An W. The influence of the partisanship and composition of state governments on public school spending and student outcomes in the NCLB era. Dissertation of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). University of Iowa. 2021. 145 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.005897.

Batyuk L. Major aspects of STEM education based on U.S. government initiatives. Educational Challenges. 2025. Vol. 30 (1). P. 88–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2025.30.1.06.

Batyuk L., Masych V. Features of Modern Higher Education in the USA: STEM Education. Educological Discourse. 2025. Vol. 50 (3). P. 26–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829/2025.3.3.

Batyuk L., Zhernovnykova O. Modern educational digital competence of future doctors of Poland as a European state. New Collegium. 2022. № 3. Р. 55–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30837/nc.2022.3.55.

California Council on Science and Technology. 2026. URL: https://ccst.us.

California Institute of Technology. 2026. URL: https://www.caltech.edu.

Campanile C. NY teachers’ unions pump school spending to highest in the nation at $36K per kid – yet they rank low in reading and math: report. New York Post. 2026. URL: https://nypost.com/2025/01/17/us-news/new-york-state-is-biggest-spender-on-schools-with-mediocre-results/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Chin M.J., Shi L. The Impact of Political Party Control on Education Finance and Outcomes: Evidence from U.S. States. EdWorkingPaper. 2021. № 20–280. Р. 1–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26300/kvw2-5725.

Dick S.J. NASA’s first 50 years: historical perspectives. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. 2010. 765 р.

Digital Education Action Plan: policy background. European Commission. 2026. URL: https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/plan.

European Education Area. Higher education. 2026. URL: https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education.

European Qualifications Framework (EQF). Europa Union. 2026. URL: https://europass.europa.eu/en/european-qualifications-framework-eqf.

Explore 2024 NAEP Results for Science at Grade 8 and Mathematics and Reading at Grade 12. Institute of Education Sciences. 2026. URL: https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.

Ezell L.N. The NASA Historical Data Book. Volume II. Programs and Projects 1958–1968. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Washington, DC, 1998. 642 p.

Ford P.B., Lomax T.J. An Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Large Texas Urban Areas. Research Report 1193-lF. Texas Transportation Institute the Texas A&M University System. 1989. Vol. I. 114 р.

College Station-Bryan, Texas. Comprehensive housing market analysis. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2007. 14 p.

Furnas A.C., Fishman N., Rosenstiel L., Wang D. Partisan disparities in the funding of science in the United States. Republican lawmakers consistently provided robust federal funding, often exceeding Democrats. Science. 2025. Vol. 389 (6766). Р. 1195–1200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adx5154.

Hatfield J. Partisan divides over K-12 education in 8 charts. 2023. Pew Research Center. 2026. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/05/partisan-divides-over-k-12-education-in-8-charts/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Horizon Europe. 2026. URL: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en.

Hurst D., Tan A., Meek A., Sellers J. Overview and Inventory of State Education Reforms: 1990 to 2000. Project Officer: E. McArthur. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. NCES 2003–020. Washington, DC: 2003. 2003. 137 р.

Kocabas S. A Thesis Master of Science. Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University. STEM Education in the United States. 2018. 85 p.

Lips D., Moritz M. Reforming Federal K-12 Education R&D Activities to Strengthen American Competitiveness. 2024. 30 p. URL: https://www.alicoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Reforming-Federal-K12-Education-RD-to-Strengthen-American-Competitiveness.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Milner N.A. Brief History of Silicon Valley. Milner Company Marketing LLP. 2008. 13 p.

NASA Awards Help Inspire Future Innovators Through STEM Engagement. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2026. URL: https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-awards-help-inspire-future-innovators-through-stem-engagement.

National Defense Education Act of 1958. 85th Congress 2d Session. Report № 2157. 49 р. 1958.

National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2024. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. 2026. URL: https://ncses.nsf.gov/indicators.

Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/18290.

Ogawa R.T., Loomis M., Crain R. Institutional History of an Interactive Science Center: The Founding and Development of the Exploratorium. Science Education. 2009. № 93 (2). Р. 269–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20299.

Rhode P.W. The evolution of California manufacturing. Public Policy Institute of California. 2001. 126 p.

State Adoptions of Science Standards. 2026. 11 p. URL: https://www.copeinc.org/docs/State-Adoptions.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

STEM Education Act of 2014. H. R. 5031. 2014. 5p. URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-113hr5031ih/pdf/BILLS-113hr5031ih.pdf.

Summary Findings. External Evaluation of the K-12 Science Leader Network. 2021. 1p. URL: https://www.exploratorium.edu/sites/default/files/files/Inverness%20Exploratorium%201%20pg%20Summary%20Findings%20July%202021%20FINAL%20.pdf.

TEKS Guide. 2026. URL: https://teksguide.org.

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills: Summary for Parents. Institution Texas Education Agency, Austin. 1998. 29 p. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED445092.pdf.

UC Berkeley. 2026. URL: https://www.berkeley.edu.

Zolotarova O., Merezhko N. Digitization of education: European format. Foreign trade economics finance law. Series: Economic Sciences. 2022. № 4. Р. 91–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2022(123)08.

Published

2026-05-13